Why don’t we detect at-risk drinkers? A qualitative study of GP beliefs and attitudes
This presentation was presented at the 2013 RACGP GP13 Convention in Darwin, 17-19 October 2013.
Authors:
- Michael Tam
- Nicholas Zwar
- Roslyn Markham
YouTube video presentation:
Click here for Prezi presentation.
Like this:
Like Loading...
Michael Tam
Dr Michael Tam is a clinical academic Specialist General Practitioner, combining the provision of family medicine, research, health services development, and governance. Michael’s clinical interest is in the whole-person primary care of people living with mental illness. He is actively involved in mental health policy, strategy, and governance, with local, state, and national bodies. Michael’s research is in integrated care and preventive care in general practice. He has expertise in both qualitative and quantitative research methods.
2 comments
Author
This presentation was awarded the Alan Chancellor Award at the GP13 Conference: http://foundation.racgp.org.au/information/alanchancellor/
Author
This presentation was reported by Byron Kaye on 21 October 2013 in Medical Observer: http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/gps-reluctant-to-screen-patients-for-atrisk-drinking
GPs reluctant to screen patients for at-risk drinking
TWO-thirds of at-risk drinkers presenting to GPs do not have their habit picked up partly because their doctor fears straining the relationship, research presented at the RACGP’s annual conference suggests.
The study of four groups of Sydney GPs found that three in 10 adults who see a GP are classified as at-risk drinkers. But the lead researcher, University of NSW public health lecturer Dr Michael Tam, said that only one in 10 patients was detected as being at risk.
The study identified four key complaints from GPs when explaining their reluctance to use existing alcohol screening tools such as the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and its shorter version, the AUDIT-C: social and cultural attitudes to drinking; the importance of doctor-patient relationships; the difficulty of alcohol screening in general practice; and the ineffectiveness of existing screening tools.
GPs were unwilling to screen because of “the sense that at-risk drinking is not only normal but also desirable”, Dr Tam told the conference.
GPs were also careful to “avoid conflict” when discussing alcohol use with patients, he said.
Even when GPs used screening questionnaires, they were seen as ineffective because of doctors’ concerns that the information patients gave may be unreliable and because of concerns that their relationship would be affected.
“Although detecting at-risk drinking was considered important, alcohol screening questionnaires were not perceived as part of routine practice by our participants,” the authors said.
“Universal screening was seen as impractical and the AUDIT-C in particular was considered to have poor practical utility. It seems unlikely that approaches that focus on GP use of these tools will be successful at improving detection of at-risk drinking.”
BMC Family Practice 2013; 14:121